cimin esfandiari; azadeh elyasi
Abstract
The present article to examine the topic of self-knowledge of the mystical and philosophical dimension from the point of view of the two eastern and western mystic philosophers sheikh ...
Read More
The present article to examine the topic of self-knowledge of the mystical and philosophical dimension from the point of view of the two eastern and western mystic philosophers sheikh shahabudinsuhrawardi and sorenkierkegaard with comparative look. Kierkegaard consistently belives in his philosophy to handle the general affairs and the nature of things has causel the human to not know and ignor his ownself.sheikheshragh also in numerous works especially in his encoded stories have always been the factores of human neglect of its essence including human downfall attachment to its belongins and his entangled in prison body. What Kierkegaard as existential movement to achieve self-knowledge express at different stages. He most approached suhrawardis mystical teachings because he introduces heart to God and endeavours with faith and seriousness for evolution in the inner that are the most important tools of self- knowledge. Of course in this regard there is fundamental difference with suhrawardi because in his thinking he has no belief in using rational propositions and analyzes in relation to the question of self- knowledge. However suhrawardiapplay the only correct way to your own truth to both the rational and the mystical method which complement each other.
